Management of Deep Retinal Capillary Ischemia by Electromagnetic Stimulation and Platelet-Rich Plasma: Preliminary Clinical Results
The study included 28 eyes of 17 patients aged 15-76 years (average 37.9 years) suffering from deep retinal capillary ischemia. Patients who had acute onset paracentral scotoma in the last 1 month were included in the study. The eyes were divided into three groups, Group 1 received only electromagnetic stimulation, Group 2 received electromagnetic stimulation and PRP treatment, and the last group, which had received no kind of treatment, was used as a control group . Statistically significant best adjusted visual acuity improvement (p = 0.01) was achieved in Group 2.
Introduction: To investigate the efficacy of retinal electromagnetic stimulation and subtenon autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of deep retinal capillary ischemia.
Methods: The study included 28 eyes of 17 patients aged 15–76 years (mean 37.9 years) who had deep retinal capillary ischemia. Patients who had acute-onset paracentral scotoma in the last 1 month were included in the study between January 2018 and January 2019. The diagnosis of deep retinal capillary ischemia was based on clinical history and typical findings of optical coherence tomography angiography. The eyes were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 7 eyes) received electromagnetic stimulation alone; group 2 (n = 7 eyes) received electromagnetic stimulation and sub-tenon autologous platelet-rich plasma injection; group 3 had no intervention and served as a control group (n = 14 eyes). The patients underwent ten sessions of electromagnetic stimulation in
groups 1 and 2. Sub-tenon autologous plateletrich plasma injection was performed immediately after the first, fifth, and tenth sessions of electromagnetic stimulation in group 2. The deep retinal capillary density and best corrected visual acuity changes were investigated before and after treatment at the first month.
Results: The mean deep retinal capillary density was 52.0% before electromagnetic stimulation and 56.1% after ten sessions of application in group 1; this improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.01). In the combined treatment group (group 2), the mean deep retinal capillary density was 46.9% before the treatment and 56.5% after the treatment; this increase was also statistically significant (p = 0.01). Statistically significant best corrected visual acuity improvement (p = 0.01) could be achieved only in group 2. The combined treatment was significantly superior (p\0.01) to treatment with only electromagnetic stimulation regarding best corrected visual acuity and deep retinal capillary density. In the control group (group 3), there was no statistically significant change (p = 0.09) in the mean deep retinal capillary density and best corrected visual acuity.
Conclusion: Treatment of the underlying cause is a priority in the treatment of deep retinal capillary ischemia. However, in the acute period, local ischemia treatment is necessary to prevent permanent retinal damage and scotomas. In mild cases, only electromagnetic stimulation, which is non-invasive and easy to use, might have a beneficial effect on deep retinal capillary density. In more severe cases, sub-tenon fresh autologous platelet-rich plasma injection together with electromagnetic stimulation may be more effective in the treatment of local ischemia of the retina in order to augment the response.